急性冠状动脉综合征合并2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉介入术后替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷抗血小板疗效及预后
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

青岛市医药科研指导计划项目(2014-WJZD048)


Antiplatelete Efficacy and Prognosis Between Ticagrelor and Clopidolgrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 应用血栓弹力图(TEG)评价替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)合并糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后抗血小板的疗效及预后。方法 纳入ACS合并糖尿病行PCI术的患者180例。随机分为两组,氯吡格雷组(n92)术前接受负荷量阿司匹林300 mg+氯吡格雷300 mg,术后给予阿司匹林100 mg/d,氯吡格雷75 mg/d;替格瑞洛组(n88)术前接受负荷量阿司匹林300 mg+替格瑞洛180 mg,术后给予阿司匹林100 mg/d,替格瑞洛90 mg,每天两次。血栓弹力图检测两组患者PCI术后24 h花生四烯酸(AA)诱导的血小板抑制率和二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的血小板抑制率,观察并比较两组3个月内不良心血管事件及出血等安全性事件。结果 替格瑞洛组ADP激活血小板形成最大血凝块强度(MA-ADP),低于氯吡格雷组(34.94%±11.91%比47.16%±14.90%,P<0.001)。血小板AA抑制率、ADP抑制率替格瑞洛组明显高于氯吡格雷组(68.24%±22.96%比48.21%±32.91%,58.16%±23.52%比33.34%±26.67%,P<0.001)。结论 ACS合并2型糖尿病患者中,替格瑞洛抗血小板聚集的效果明显优于氯吡格雷,可显著降低3个月内心血管终点事件的发生率,不增加出血风险。

    Abstract:

    Aim Thrombelastography for evaluating the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI. Methods Eighty-seven patients with ACS and diabetes undergoing PCI were randomized into two groups. The patients of clopidolgrel group(n92) were preoperatively given in loading aspirin 300 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg, followed by 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel per day. The patients of ticagrelor group(n88) were preoperatively given in loading aspirin 300 mg and ticagrelor 180 mg followed by 100 mg aspirin per day and 90 mg ticagrelor twice one day. We investigated platelet reactivity (AA inhibition rate and ADP inhibition rate) by thrombelastography, and observed ischemic of cardiac and bleeding events over 3 months. Results Ticagrelor group had low rate of MA-ADP pathway(%) compared with clopidogrel group(34.94%±11.91% vs 47.16%±14.90%,P<0.001). For the inhibition rate in AA pathway(%) and inhibition rate in ADP pathway(%),ticagrelor group was superior to clopidogrel group (68.24%±22.96% vs 48.21%±32.91%,58.16%±23.52% vs 33.34%±26.67%,P<0.001). Conclusion Ticagrelor had more power to inhibit platelet reactivity compared with clopidolgrel in patients with ACS and diabetes undergoing PCI. Ticagrelor reduced ischaemic events during 3 months, without increasing bleeding events compared with clopidogrel.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李晓通,于忠祥,延荣强.急性冠状动脉综合征合并2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉介入术后替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷抗血小板疗效及预后[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2015,23(12):1253~1257.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-12-26