生物可吸收聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架与耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中应用的比较:临床试验Meta分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.杭州师范大学医学院, ;2.杭州师范大学附属医院心血管内科,浙江省杭州市 310015)

作者简介:

张海福,硕士研究生,医师,研究方向为冠心病,E-mail为1375100541@qq.com。通信作者张邢炜,博士,主任医师,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向为冠心病,E-mail为 Xwzhang@hznu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

浙江省自然科学基金青年基金项目(LQI8H020006);杭州师范大学附属医院科研基金项目(杭师大附院[2018]180号);浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2020364695)


Comparison of bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-eluting stents with durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus:a Meta-analysis of clinical trials
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University;2.Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 分析在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中应用生物可吸收聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架的有效性和安全性。方法 检索国内外数据库,检索对比生物可吸收聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架(BP-DES)与耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架(DP-DES)在冠心病合并糖尿病患者应用的临床随机对照试验,主要结果为靶病变失败率、靶血管血运重建率、靶病变血运重建率以及心源性死亡率,用以评估有效性和安全性。结果 共纳入14项随机对照试验,其中3 855例患者应用BP-DES,2 916例患者应用DP-DES,平均随访时间为2.9年。BP-DES对比DP-DES在整体的靶病变失败率为13.5%比12.8%(RR:1.07,95%CI:0.88~1.29,P=0.50),靶病变血运重建率以及靶血管血运重建率在整体上无统计学差异,根据随访时间小于3年、随访3年以及随访时间超过3年分为3组进行亚组分析,结果表明各个亚组之间均无统计学差异。BP-DES对比DP-DES总的心源性死亡率为6.2%比5.4%(RR:1.10,95%CI:0.90~1.34,P=0.35),根据随访时间进行亚组分析均无统计学差异。结论 在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中,BP-DES对比DP-DES拥有类似的安全性和有效性。

    Abstract:

    Aim To analyze the efficacy and safety of bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods The study searched database both at home and abroad, and retrieved the clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) of comparison of bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) and durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stent (DP-DES) in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus. The efficacy and safety were evaluated by target lesion failure rate, target vessel revascularization rate, target lesion revascularization rate and cardiogenic mortality rate. Results A total of 14 RCT were included, of which 3 855 patients were treated with BP-DES and 2 916 patients with DP-DES, with a mean follow-up of 2.9 years. The overall target lesion failure rate of BP-DES versus DP-DES was 13.5% versus 12.8% (RR:1.7,5% CI:0.88~1.29, P=0.50). The overall cardiac mortality rate of BP-DES versus DP-DES was 6.2% versus 5.4% (RR:1.0,5%CI:0.90~1.34, P=0.35), and the overall target lesion and target vessel revascularization rates were not statistically different. There were no statistically significant differences in subgroup analysis according to follow-up time. Conclusion In patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes, BP-DES has a similar safety and efficacy profile to DP-DES.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张海福,张媛媛,张琴霞,杨栋,张邢炜.生物可吸收聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架与耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中应用的比较:临床试验Meta分析[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2021,29(1):74~81.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:2020-04-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-01-22